Mozilla Firefox Dumps Google in Favor of Yahoo! Search
Firefox users conduct over 100 billion searches per year & starting in December Yahoo! will be the default search choice in the US, under a new 5 year agreement.
Google has been the Firefox global search default since 2004. Our agreement came up for renewal this year, and we took this as an opportunity to review our competitive strategy and explore our options.
In evaluating our search partnerships, our primary consideration was to ensure our strategy aligned with our values of choice and independence, and positions us to innovate and advance our mission in ways that best serve our users and the Web. In the end, each of the partnership options available to us had strong, improved economic terms reflecting the significant value that Firefox brings to the ecosystem. But one strategy stood out from the rest.
In Russia they'll default to Yandex & in China they'll default to Baidu.
One weird thing about that announcement is there is no mention of Europe & Google's dominance is far greater in Europe. I wonder if there was a quiet deal with Google in Europe, if they still don't have their Europe strategy in place, or what their strategy is.
Added: Danny Sullivan confirmed Google remain the default search engine in Firefox in Europe, though there is no formal financial deal associated with the relationship.
Google paid Firefox roughly $300 million per year for the default search placement. Yahoo!'s annual search revenue is on the order of $1.8 billion per year, so if they came close to paying $300 million a year, then Yahoo! has to presume they are going to get at least a few percentage points of search marketshare lift for this to pay for itself.
It also makes sense that Yahoo! would be a more natural partner fit for Mozilla than Bing would. If Mozilla partnered with Bing they would risk developer blowback from pent up rage about anti-competitive Internet Explorer business practices from 10 or 15 years ago.
It is also worth mentioning our recent post about how Yahoo! boosts search RPM by doing about a half dozen different tricks to preference paid search results while blending in the organic results.
Yahoo Ads | Yahoo Organic Results | |
Placement | top of the page | below the ads |
Background color | none / totally blended | none |
Ad label | small gray text to right of advertiser URL | n/a |
Sitelinks | often 5 or 6 | usually none, unless branded query |
Extensions | star ratings, etc. | typically none |
Keyword bolding | on for title, description, URL & sitelinks | off |
Underlines | ad title & sitelinks, URL on scroll over | off |
Click target | entire background of ad area is clickable | only the listing title is clickable |
Though the revenue juicing stuff from above wasn't present in the screenshot Mozilla shared about Yahoo!'s new clean search layout they will offer Firefox users.
It shows red ad labels to the left of the ads and bolding on both the ads & organics.
Here is Marissa Mayer's take:
At Yahoo, we believe deeply in search – it’s an area of investment and opportunity for us. It’s also a key growth area for us - we’ve now seen 11 consecutive quarters of growth in our search revenue on an ex-TAC basis. This partnership helps to expand our reach in search and gives us an opportunity to work even more closely with Mozilla to find ways to innovate in search, communications, and digital content. I’m also excited about the long-term framework we developed with Mozilla for future product integrations and expansion into international markets.
Our teams worked closely with Mozilla to build a clean, modern, and immersive search experience that will launch first to Firefox’s U.S. users in December and then to all Yahoo users in early 2015.
Even if Microsoft is only getting a slice of the revenues, this makes the Bing organic & ad ecosystem stronger while hurting Google. (Unless of course this is a step 1 before Marissa finds a way to nix the Bing deal and partner back up with Google on search). Yahoo! already has a partnership to run Google contextual ads. A potential Yahoo! Google search partnership was blocked back in 2008. Yahoo! also syndicates Bing search ads in a contextual format to other sites through Media.net and has their Gemini Stream Ads product which powers some of their search ads on mobile devices and on content sites is a native ad alternative to Outbrain and Taboola. When they syndicate the native ads to other sites, the ads are called Yahoo! Recommends.
Both Amazon and eBay have recently defected (at least partially) from the Google ad ecosystem. Amazon has also been pushing to extend their ad network out to other sites.
Greg Sterling worries this might be a revenue risk for Firefox: "there may be some monetary risk for Firefox in leaving Google." Missing from that perspective:
- How much less Google paid Mozilla before the most recent contract lifted by a competitive bid from Microsoft
- If Bing goes away, Google will drastically claw down on the revenue share offered to other search partners.
- Google takes 45% from YouTube publishers
- Google took over a half-decade (and a lawsuit) to even share what their AdSense revenue share was
- look at eHow's stock performance
- While Google's search ad revenue has grown about 20% per year their partner ad network revenues have stagnated as their traffic acquisition costs as a percent of revenue have dropped
The good thing about all the Google defections is the more networks there are the more opportunities there are to find one which works well / is a good fit for whatever you are selling, particularly as Google adds various force purchased junk to their ad network - be it mobile "Enhanced" campaigns or destroying exact match keyword targeting.
Comments
Although Google is preferred by most users, it would be like a breath of fresh air to see Yahoo on Firefox. I have used it in the past (still do at times) and the search engines has its advantages. I'd agree that it's a risky move - but where there's great risk, there's a chance of greater success.
Firefox is not as good as it was, now I prefer Chrome
...if SEO is a hobby there is nothing wrong with Chrome, but the more your income relies on driving organic search traffic the less incentive there is to use Chrome as your primary browser. Diversity creates opportunity. I am not saying Firefox or Yahoo! Search are perfect, but an ecosystem with a healthy mix of players gives participants in the ecosystem many chances to win & makes it harder for a single player to shut one out of the market entirely.
Anyone using Chrome is living with permanent spyware. Your every breath is being recorded by Google and sent over in compressed form to NSA, DHS, CIA and anyone else in government who happens to want it. With Chromium you stand a fighting chance but Google deliberately cripples Chromium (it doesn't have the Widevine plugin available in any shape or form).
I recently tried Firefox again (after disabling a bunch of my SEO extensions) and it's a lot cleaner and faster than it used to be. My browser of choice again. Google has overloaded its gift horse (webkit) and it's not fit to ride any more. I use an older version of OS X so I do need another up-to-date browser for those (thankfully relatively few) technology fascists who will not support Safari 5 any more.
PS. Aaron, you've been hitting it out of the park since you took over your own blog again. Most of the guest posts were not of the same calibre. Thanks for the very well documented indictment of Google's dirty tricks.
Opera.
I think Opera makes a nice compliment to Firefox & use Opera as my browser for writing our newsletters and posting to our member forums.
Thanks for the comment. Agree on not using Chrome & how Google is trying to cripple Chromium in the same way they have been pulling features out of the open-source version of Android and putting them into their official licensed bundled part of Android. Uninstalled Chrome a long time ago. When I was chatting with my mom a few months ago I saw they somehow got it on her machine & of course that was quickly removed. I think the only devices I have with any bit of Chrome or Android or such in them would be a Nintendo Wii and a Kindle Fire, but those have been heavily modded by the manufacturers to limit data leakage back to the borg or such.
Add new comment